The Kodak 14N was followed by the DCS Pro SLR/n and SLR/c cameras. The "n" camera is a Nikon mount and the "c" is a Canon mount. Both have full-frame, 14 megapixel sensors. These cameras were more reliable than the 14N, but still had their own quirks.

I own an SLR/c and used it as my primary camera with the Canon TS-E lenses for about a year. It produced reasonably good images, but was in for repair three times within that first year.

Kodak discontinued these cameras and no longer supports them, but they can still be found used. I still keep my SLR/c around as a backup camera.

Now, as for Nikon's marketing rational, it's my personal opinion that they don't view a full-frame sensor and the architectural market as being important factors in their overall sales. Nikon banks heavily on customer loyalty and brand identity.

I realize this thread is kind of old, but for what it's worth to anyone else checking out old posts as I am -

I have a Nikon 24MM PC lens. I haven't really used it on interiors yet but I have been satisfied using it on exteriors.

I agree with the early post - this is much more effective than simply stretching those pixels!

Now more than ever--that is if you're after the look of a master architectural photographer. Re-read my previous post.

Alan